What is the likely outcome, if unpaid community services make mandatory part of the high school programme? To comment on this subject, I am including a study, which collected statistical data taken from polls conducted, recently, among diverse segments of society. To conclude, despite some advantages, unpaid community services should not be promoted in the early stages of education. Nevertheless, I think that students should be more focused on education and should not be forced to do something that might detract them from their main target and task. Thus, these programmes instil moral and ethical values in the mind of children which is degenerating today’s generation enormously. However, one should not ignore the fact that if community services become a part of high school education, everyone gets a chance to work for society.
Consequently, they may lose interest in doing those kinds of services later on. In addition, it would develop a negative attitude towards the unpaid community services from the tender age. Since they are not capable of handling service programmes effectively, they may feel difficulties and dissatisfied while implementing such activities among others. Moreover, during this period of time, most of the students are not mature enough. Besides, if they are to perform such community activities, they would definitely face challenges in the academic area and sometimes, they may fail in the examinations. For example, in India, most of the schools have added more subjects recently in the curriculum of high schools. First and foremost, students have a lot of subjects to study within a limited period of time and that would become even harder in case the community programmes are made compulsory for them. Unpaid community services should not be mandatory in the high school programmes. Even though it has some positives, it should not be included in the high school education due to various reasons. Certain people strongly argue that these types of services should be included in high school education such as charity activities, teaching other children and activities for society. People have divergent attitudes towards the unpaid community services. In conclusion, I think there are other better ways to promote the society without making it compulsory the sitting compulsory subjects are enough. So why not make many groups in all schools, and I think that will attract many students. There are now working groups in many schools in different places which do such charitable work and even without inspiration from the school's administration. I know that this proposed idea aims to teach high school students to be responsible to their society and to take care of others, but I think there is a more efficient method. the inner desire to help others, but, instead, will make it a type of finishing your work. I believe that making that compulsory, will not lead to the heroic purpose of the charitable work i.e. Despite this, the idea of compulsory charitable work doesn't sound good for me. However, all these are examples, and there are many other ways to improve societies, both charitable and uncharitable methods. Indeed that will lead to an extremely modern, civilised and loving community. Imagine other group cleaning and decorating the streets- of course, that won't affect their dignity- or teaching the young. Imagine that in the vacation, some youths, and even all ages, work for charitable organisations which help the poor, the sick, the learners and others.
One of the proposed ideas, yet under observation, is to make it compulsory for high school students to do some programmes, of course, charity ones, to assist their community.įirstly, I am completely supporting the idea that: helping promote the society is one of the main duties of a righteous and positive member. In the last few years, many new ideas and beliefs arose aiming to improve society and reinforce the relationship between members of a society.
0 kommentar(er)
